Revolutionizing the world, one "I agree" at a time
Thursday, December 20, 2007
David Bernat, 2:29 AM:
The Longshots Get The Freedom To Speak

"Who is Ron Paul?" bumper stickers have started popping up in Ithaca and on the Cornell Campus. Frankly, all I know about him is that he's "the libertarian GOP candidate." And frankly, until Super Tuesday I couldn't care less about the presidential candidates, most of whom are more whack-job than fit for the job. But this interview of Ron Paul on Neil Cavuto (FNC) is a refreshing breath of air and, well, frank.

(The retreat by Cavuto at the end is also good viewing.)
Monday, November 19, 2007
stephen, 6:05 PM:
best ads yet

of course ron paul remains my favorite conservative nutcase. but i gotta give credit where credit is due, and mike huckabee is, at least, consistently the most fun. check it.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Mark Dixon, 3:39 PM:
Fredo, Fredo, Fredo.

"I will no longer represent only the White House; I will represent the United States of America and its people. I understand the differences between the two roles."

- Alberto Gonzales, testifying at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in January 2005.
Sunday, August 12, 2007
stephen, 1:56 PM:
How we lost Afghanistan.

When reading this, imagine the sound of my head exploding.

Um, just because I have a self-interested memory, and because I remember discussing this with y'all -- when I was expressing qualms about the War in Afghanistan, I acknowledged the need to go after Al Queda, but was worried that we were too invested in nation-destroying and not enough in nation-building. Is this right? Or am I being too charitable about what was essentially a knee-jerk antiwar response?

Oh, and while we're talking about Al Queda, what did everybody think of the Obama Pakistan flap?
Friday, June 29, 2007
Mark Dixon, 10:55 PM:
How soon we forget.

In Jan. 1971, Congress quietly repealed the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin resolution that gave Lyndon Johnson authority to escalate the war in Vietnam.

An editorial that month in TIME Magazine said that the resolution's significance in history "may be not only that it further embroiled the U.S. in Vietnam and raised loud voices of dissent at home, but that it probably marked the last time that the U.S. Congress would ever hand the President such a heady carte blanche with so little care."
Monday, June 04, 2007
David Bernat, 3:39 AM:
Hey A-Abbott!

I wrote this sketch at for a Christmas show at the physics department my first year at Cornell. As we've seen more action here lately, I came across it again tonight and thought I'd post it. It's meant to be read as Abbott and Costello's Who's On First routine.

TA: Students, today in class we’re going to discuss yesterday’s experiment. -- What went on in this lab?

Student: What do you mean?

TA: What did you do in this lab?

Student: Lab 3.

TA: And what did you do in lab 3?

Student: We measured the result.

TA: Assume I’ve never seen this lab before, and you were going to explain it to me. What would you say?

Student: (pause) Well, it was all about getting the slope.

TA: The slope of what?

Student: The slope of the plot. We plotted some points.

TA: I know that, but assume I’ve never seen this lab. How would you explain what you did?

Student: We got the wires and measured at each point.

TA: Measured what?

Student: What the meter said.

TA: (pause) Look, you’re report tells me nothing. This could be an experiment about baking cakes. What’s this number here?

Student: 5.

TA: Yes, I KNOW it’s 5. What did it measure?

Student: The slope. Of the line.

TA: In lab, you ran an experiment, you plotted some points. What was the result?

Student: (jokingly) We finished the experiment. We went home.

TA: (frustrated, patiently) If I was a total stranger, how would you explain this lab to me?

Student: You just connect it up—

TA: Connect WHAT up?

Student: The circuit.

TA: Why?

Student: I’m sorry I don’t know what you’re asking.

TA: I’m asking, what is this lab all about?

Student: We, we plugged in the wires and got 5.

TA: 5 what?

Student: The slope.

TA: WHAT was the slope?

Student: 5.

TA: Yesterday, I saw you take your wires and hook them up to the power supply.

Student: Yes.

TA: We called the voltage y and the current x.

Student: Of course, we wrote it in our lab just like you said. Voltage y

TA: And current x.

Student: Exactly.

TA: Then what?

Student: We divided the voltage by the current to find the slope.

TA: What was the slope for?

Student: It was 5.

TA: Okay, the slope was 5. And Why?

Student: That was four.

TA: What?

Student: Huh? Y, it was 4.

TA: I’m not asking about Y. The slope. What was it for?

Student: I just told you it was 5!

TA: You plotted the data, you calculated the slope. What was your point?

Student: I was starting to wonder if you had one.

TA: From the plot. The slope is 5. Y is four. You must have had an ex?

Student: What does that matter?

TA: I’m curious.

Student : Why?

TA: No, not why. Ex. Do you have an ex?

Student: Are you looking to date me or something?

TA: What?

Student: Huh? I’m sorry, I don’t know what you’re asking.

TA: Oookay, from the beginning. Where did the plot come from?

Student: We drew it.

TA: From what?

Student: From the experiment.

TA: The experiment about what?

Student: Lab 3! We had Voltage Y. We had Current X. What is it you want to know?

TA: Why are you giving me so much resistance?!

Student: Resistance? That’s what the slope is!

TA: (expires)

Tuesday, May 15, 2007
stephen, 10:25 AM:
McSweeny's Candidates



Predictably, the first field is stronger than the second. Enjoy!

Powered by Blogger

eXTReMe Tracker